|
Rate This Blog
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 0 rating(s)
Categories
• Exploratory Data Analysis
• Designed Experiments • Interrelationship Digraphs • Study Cause and Effect • Analyze Common Cause Variation • Process Improvement • Process Capability Indices • Rosen Yield Example • Hoerl-Snee Strategy • Is–Is Not Analysis • Cause and Effect Diagram • Pareto Chart • Flowchart • Special Cause • Basic Concepts • History • Six Sigma
Archives
Latest Entries
Loading...
Links
Loading...
|
Statistical Thinking to Improve Quality
This blog examines the use of data analyses and statistical tools in a framework of statistical thinking to improve quality. The following principles form the basis for statistical thinking:
* All work occurs in a system of interconnected processes, * Variation exists in all processes, and * Understanding and reducing variation are keys to success. Statistical thinking significantly improves the effectiveness of data analyses and statistical tools.
Background and Motivation
Posted by:
Gordon Clark on
November 3, 2009 at
7:28PM CST
In January 1994, the Statistics Division (Britz et al, 1996) adopted a tactical plan to Enable Broad Application of Statistical Thinking. The division developed a definition of Statistical Thinking which was published by Quality Press in 1996. That definition is identical to the principles listed above as the basis for Statistical Thinking. As the Past Chair of the division, I am motivated to promote the use of Statistical Thinking. Why does the Statistics Division assign such a high priority to Statistical Thinking? Why doesn’t the Statistics Division simply emphasize statistical methods such as SPC, DOE and regression analysis? The answer is that the benefits of statistical methods are significantly improved by their use in the context of Statistical Thinking. Brtiz el (2000) point out that Statistical Thinking incorporates key concepts from several improvement methodologies such as Six Sigma, Total Quality Management (TQM) and systems thinking. These key concepts include:
Clearly, Six Sigma uses Statistical Thinking. Benbow and Kubiak (2005) state on page 2:
Six Sigma uses a measure of variation, illustrated in the figure, as its overall measure of project success. That is, for the distribution of the key quality characteristic, the distance from its mean to the closest specification limit (LSL or USL) measured in standard deviation (sigma) units. In my opinion, Six Sigma is an example of Statistical Thinking. We will see later that a customer focus is inherent in Statistical Thinking because a process includes its customer. References
Send This | Categories: Basic Concepts, Six Sigma
|
|